MOGADISHU (SD) – The Somali Future Council has announced its support for a Transitional Direct Elections Model, describing it as a practical framework for maintaining political stability and achieving broad-based agreement on Somalia’s electoral future.

In a statement issued today, the council said Somalia is facing a critical political period that requires an electoral approach tailored to current realities while preserving the country’s existing power-sharing arrangements.

The council emphasized that its support for the proposed model is conditional upon broad political consensus among key stakeholders and a process built on consultation, dialogue, and agreement.

According to the statement, the council believes the transitional model could provide a pathway toward inclusive elections while safeguarding stability during a sensitive phase in Somalia’s political development.

The group also stressed its opposition to any postponement of elections or political arrangements that could create a governance vacuum or contribute to instability.

The council called on political leaders and stakeholders to continue dialogue and compromise in order to reach a lasting agreement capable of preventing political division and uncertainty.

It further announced plans to formally present detailed proposals regarding the transitional election model, including its guiding principles, implementation procedures, and mechanisms for ensuring broad participation by political actors and society.

The statement comes as discussions continue among Somali political leaders over the future electoral framework, constitutional questions, and the country’s political transition.

The Somali Future Council’s endorsement of a Transitional Direct Elections Model is politically significant because it signals support for a compromise approach at a time when Somalia remains divided over how future elections should be conducted.

By backing a transitional framework while insisting on political consensus and preservation of the 4.5 power-sharing formula, the council appears to be positioning itself between advocates of immediate universal suffrage and those who favour maintaining existing indirect electoral arrangements.

The council’s emphasis on dialogue and consultation suggests recognition that no electoral model is likely to succeed without broad agreement among the Federal Government, opposition groups, and regional stakeholders.

Its rejection of election delays and political deadlock also reflects growing concern among political actors about the risk of institutional uncertainty if consensus is not reached in time.

The proposal could potentially provide a basis for further negotiations by offering a middle-ground solution that combines gradual electoral reform with political stability. However, the ultimate impact of the initiative will depend on whether other major political stakeholders are willing to support the framework once its details are formally unveiled.

As debates over elections and constitutional arrangements continue, the Future Council’s position adds another voice to the ongoing search for a consensus-based path forward for Somalia’s political transition.